May 22, 2003
liar, liar
First it was the staged toppling of the Saddam statue, now reports are emerging that the rescue of PFC Lynch was a well-orchestrated news stunt as well. I guess the bit of sarcasm here was well-earned.
Having read over the links from the alternet article I note with amusement the article on Fox decrying the BBC's anti-american bias(???) also carries a banner claiming Fox provides "unbiased fair and accurate reporting".....
Sometimes the most comical ironies are the elaborations of a bad liar.
Posted by: Sean on May 24, 2003 07:52 AMas an afterthought I thought you might like to take a look at , this related article I think the comments posted by readers there says a great deal about the current mindset of the british.
Posted by: Sean on May 24, 2003 08:01 AMSean, those comments are indeed very revealing. Particularly interesting are the insinuations that Lynch is faking amnesia.
Quote:
"I think the 'fact' that Miss Lynch has since lost her memory and 'will probably never be able to recall what happened' (US government official statement) says it all. How convenient."
Oh, how evil! Those minions of Lord Bush have gotten to poor Jessica! I wonder what horrible threats they used to shut her up?
One would have thought that if she was 'going along with the plan', there would at least be some hazy memories of the 'rescue', for dramatic effect y'know.
Just imagine the effect on Bush's future if Lynch ever recanted, and pointed the finger at Bush? What a political meltdown! No President in his right mind would take a chance like that, especially when he already has a lock on reelection.
IMO, Bush has not been the prexy long enough to go mad.
Posted by: Big John on May 25, 2003 11:49 AMThat rescue did look far too well-staged to be real.
Posted by: erik on May 26, 2003 06:11 AMBig John,
Lord Bush may not have been pretzel long enough to go mad. He does appear though to have had sufficient time to squander the trust and goodwill of the majority of people in America's closest (and only military) ally.
Not bad going really.
Posted by: Sean on May 28, 2003 05:01 AM"He does appear though to have had sufficient time to squander the trust and goodwill of the majority of people in America's closest (and only military) ally."
Who, the British? Last I heard, the majority had swung over to our way of thinking.
Trying to guage the British mood thru the media filters seems dicey to me. What really counts is what they DID. And I haven't heard that Blair is facing any no-confidence votes.
Actions speak louder than words.
Posted by: Big John on May 29, 2003 07:58 AMThe trouble with politics in Britain at the moment is that Blair has a majority so huge that he can weather pretty extensive revolts within his own party, and in turn this is not because he's popular, but because the traditional opposition party are so useless. This means that the safety of Blair's position isn't a good guide to the satisfaction of his electorate, so much as a symptom of the poverty of our political scene.
During the war itself I think a slim majority of Brits supported it (I can't be quite sure because I was abroad for the duration, so I'm relying on news sources and friends' interpretations), and for a while afterwards it looked like this majority might grow because, let's face it, very few people will miss Saddam. However, the questions about legitimacy have been coming back to haunt Blair, and I think this week's stories about unrest in Baghdad & Fallujah, together with Rumsfeld's statements about WMDs might just bring things to a head.
My opinion (and I can't be certain of this, but at least I'm reporting from London, so my information is first-hand) is that the British public is now pretty evenly split about whether the war was justified or not. Most people don't believe the WMD story, but I think there is a significant group who think that we did the right thing, whether for the right reasons or not.
However, I do think that the buildup to war and its aftermath have increased the anti-americanism that was already common over here. In the build-up because Bush was perceived as being extremely arrogant, and in the aftermath because there have been more problems in US-controlled areas than UK-controlled ones (though I can't help thinking that this might be partly because the US army has taken on the toughest places)
Posted by: eldan on May 29, 2003 05:44 PMBig John
"Trying to guage the British mood thru the media filters seems dicey to me"
Absolutely, I'd say the best thing to do was to speak to a Brit - like me for example.
Sean
Posted by: Sean on May 31, 2003 05:59 PMPost a comment
About
bio articles news contact rssMy Events
04.26: LA Times Festival of Books04.30: Claremont, California
09.23-10.04: International Literature Festival Berlin
Search
My book
Hope & Other Dangerous PursuitsIn hardcover
Buy a Signed Copy!In Morocco
De l’espoir et autres quêtes dangereusesIn Italian
La speranza e altri sogni pericolosiIn Portuguese
A Esperança È Uma TravessiaIn french
De l’espoir et autres quêtes dangereusesIn dutch
Hoop en andere gevaarlijke verlangens Hoop en andere gevaarlijke verlangens (paperpack)In spanish
Esperanza y Otros SueñosMonthly Archives
April 2008March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001










Comments