June 09, 2003
the administration's poet + mathematician
I wonder if Rummy thinks he's really Rumi.
The man who gave us, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" has another pearl for us. When asked about those ever-eluding WMDs, Rumsfeld responded, "We haven't found Saddam Hussein and I don't know anyone running around saying he didn't exist." See what he does with logic? Just think what the man could do for physics or medicine.
It's not Rumi. Reasoning like that is pure Nasreddin Hodja. And if some guy who didn't wield awesome power said it I'd laugh and think him awfully clever....
Posted by: eldan on June 10, 2003 01:12 AMWhat I don't understand is why the media aren't focussing on the far more obvious (and infinitley more frightening) implication of finding no WMD in Iraq.
If the pre-war reports provided by Rummy and friends are to be believed then the scale of Iraq's weapons stash was sufficient to pose a real and imminent threat to US security.
Surely in now that threat is greater than ever, any detterrence that existed has evaporated and anyone that does now have access to Saddams stock of goodies can reasonably be expected to put them to use as soon as they find the opportunity.
After all, what's to stop them?
It's much more usual (and in this case more comforting) to believe that politicians are a bunch of liars. But if they were telling the truth then they must currently be very very worried.
Posted by: Sean on June 11, 2003 03:49 PMWhat he said is perfectly correct from the point of view of logic. What's your problem with his statements?
Posted by: karl on June 25, 2003 05:51 AMPost a comment
About
bio articles news contact rssMy Events
04.26: LA Times Festival of Books04.30: Claremont, California
09.23-10.04: International Literature Festival Berlin
Search
My book
In hardcover
In Morocco
In Italian
In Portuguese
In french
In dutch
In spanish
Monthly Archives
April 2008March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
Comments